Research and Development

Wool growers to vote on AWI director terms as chair retires

Terry Sim, March 17, 2021

AWI chair Colette Garnsey will retire at the 2021 annual general meeting.

AUSTRALIAN Wool innovation has bowed to industry and government pressure to recommend a 10-year limit on director terms.

And the AWI chair, Colette Garnsey, will retire this year, potentially leaving an opening for at least one new director on the seven-member board.

About 2.5 years after the 2018 Review of Performance recommended a 10-year limit on AWI director terms, the levy-funded wool research, development and marketing company has agreed to put the issue to a shareholder vote, backed by chair proxy support.

Under grower body pressure, AWI last year enshrined in its charter that the AWI chair’s term be capped at eight years, but the 10-year director tenure remained one of three unresolved recommendations from the 2018 Review of Performance. The others relate to cultural change (1.14.5) and developing a 10-year wool strategy (1.3.4).

The 2018 EY Review recommended that AWI: “Implement maximum periods of board membership, including the board chair. We recommend ten years. We also recommend a minimum roll-off period of two years (period of time directors must remain off the board before standing for re-election).”

The surprise announcement that AWI shareholders will have the opportunity to vote on changes to the AWI Constitution to limit director tenure to 10 years came today with the announcement of Ms Garnsey’s retirement at the 2021 annual general meeting.

AWI said a motion that would impose a 10-year limit on the length of director terms on the AWI board will be put to shareholders at the AGM in November, where it will require the support of 75 percent of shareholders to be successful.

AWI said the Ms Garnsey’s proxy votes will be directed to supporting the motion and if it is successful it will take effect after the AGM.

If approved by shareholders, the 10-year limit on director terms would be in place concurrently with the eight-year chair term, an AWI spokesman said.

Ms Garnsey said directors resolved to support the change at the board meeting in early March.

AWI did not state why the 10-year resolution was being put to shareholders now; however, AWI has been under significant industry and government pressure to implement all 82 recommendations of the 2018 review. The company this year will also be subject to another review of performance and shareholders will vote on the levy percentage they pay to AWI for the next three years.

Garnsey retiring after 10 years

AWI director David Webster

Ms Garnsey has been an AWI director since 2011 and chair since 2018.

“I relish my role as an AWI director and will continue to work hard for Australian wool growers as long as I remain on the board.

“But under the ongoing board renewal process, this year’s AGM will be the right time for me to stand down as a director and as chairman,” she said.

AWI also said David Webster, a director since 2008 and re-elected at the 2019 AGM, has confirmed he will not be standing for re-election at the 2023 AGM, when his current term expires.

Four directors are up for rotation

AWI currently has seven directors and an AWI spokesman today confirmed that four directors are up for rotation this year – Colette Garnsey, Don Macdonald, James Morgan and Jock Laurie.

Australian Wool Innovation’s Constitution says that at every annual general meeting held in a rotation year, one-third of the directors (other than a managing director under Rule 15.2), or if the number of directors is not a multiple of three, then the number nearest to but not less than one-third, must retire from office.

The AWI spokesman confirmed that with the retirement of Ms Garnsey, this meant that only two of the other three rotating directors would need to stand for re-election, with one of the three being able to go on to serve a six-year term.

Sheep Central believes this would potentially leave an opening for at least one new director on the board at the 2021 election, assuming that the other two rotating directors, if they restand, are returned. The AWI spokesman said the board hasn’t considered which other directors outside of Ms Garnsey will stand in 2021 election.

“That decision will be made by the board in the coming months.”


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Martin Oppenheimer, March 23, 2021

    Well done Colette Garnsey for supporting the 10-year AWI director rule.

    Now growers need fresh AWI Directors with marketing and research skills to progress the industry.

    Old warhorses are not needed now.

    • Jim Gordon, March 23, 2021

      Sorry my friend, I disagree. We have to dismantle Australian Wool innovation’s head office. Millions upon millions of dollars have been spent on expensive office space to give the AWI hierarchy harbour views. They need to give notice before next September (2022) and move out to Yennora, where the Sydney wool auctions. There would have to be spare offices and the rents would be a fraction of what the levy payers are paying at the moment. All the buyers are out there, so easy to communicate with them.
      As the AWI hierarchy positions end, don’t replace them. We don’t need a board or annual general meetings, just three or four people in an office out at Yennora banking the levies then distributing the money to contract research teams and contract advertising teams — with the ideas coming from the levy payers. We don’t need fourteen people to change a light bulb.
      Take the article in the latest Beyond the Bale about the work Murdoch University is doing on whole body energy/feed efficiency. The team employed by AWI to make the decision to support this research probably costs more than the research money going to Murdoch. The system should be levies in — 0.5% or 1% — with the ideas from levy payers on how that money should be spent. This Murdoch research team needs a permanent income stream. They could work on any project, like a mini-CSIRO. Then you have money going from the grower to the research team. We have to cut out this huge gravy train and the old school tie. Remember, we haven’t got 175 million sheep any more.

Get Sheep Central's news headlines emailed to you -