Lamb Production

Tell the mulesing welfare story, but recognise the consumer is king

Terry Sim July 17, 2017

MLA managing director Richard Norton

SHEEP breeders at the Australian Sheep and Wool Show at the weekend were told the consumer is king and that they just need to tell meat and wool consumers why they mules their animals.

At the Australian Sheep Breeders Association annual dinner at the show on Saturday night, Meat & Livestock Australia managing director Richard Norton covered a range of topics in his keynote speech from domestic lamb marketing to new research and EU post-Brexit negotiations.

But it was the topic of mulesing for flystrike control and Mr Norton’s comments on its likely impact on sheep meat marketing at the recent BestWool BestLamb conference in Bendigo two weeks ago that concerned some breeders at the dinner.

Two weeks ago, in answering a question, Mr Norton said the sheep meat industry was “very exposed” on the issue of mulesing. He also told Sheep Central that mulesing is hard to defend to the global consumer and one of the “great exposures” to him as a marketer of Australian red meat in America and across Europe was antagonists showing images of mulesed sheep.

At the ASBA dinner, Mr Norton said he was not going to use the “m-word”.

“There is a word that I’m not going to use, because I’ve been warned by industry not to use it — it starts with ‘m’.” However, he went on to say he did not want to have an argument or debate on whether mulesing was good or bad.

“I said (at the BestWool BestLamb conference) that ‘what we do is market your product and I don’t think you have to be very strong or have to do too much to work out what consumers think of it (mulesing).”

“Then to the credit of some media outlets, they quoted exactly what I said,” he said.

“And my point is, we market the product, we want to tell a story; we can tell the story anyway you as the industry want to tell the story and that is ‘that it is a surgical procedure done by professionals for animal health reasons and it is done with pain relief perhaps, that’s for you as an industry to decide.

“And you do it with peer-reviewed research that says the animal doesn’t suffer,” Mr Norton said.

Click here to get the latest Sheep Central story links sent to your email inbox.

Consumers can change industries

Mr Norton told the sheep breeders “the consumer is king”.

“You don’t have to look far to work out why the consumer is king.”

Mr Norton said there is no scientific evidence of a human impact from hormonal growth promotants in beef yet the EU had just paid a $180 million fine for banning the import of meat with HGPs.

“The USA took them to the World Trade Organisation and the EU just paid.”

Yet consumers had also led to Russia and China banning hormonal growth promotants, he said.

“No scientific evidence whatsoever, (just) consumer perception.”

Mr Norton said consumers had also driven an EU ban on the castration of pigs.

“This is a global macro trend and we are not immune to it and just need to tell the story.”

“If you have a story to tell as to why you need to do something, then just tell the story, and that’s the point I was trying to make.”

Mr Norton said he met a lot of people when he arrived at the Australian Sheep and Wool Show on Saturday who were “absolutely outraged” about his BestWool BestLamb Conference comments.

Mr Norton said one upset man told him: “Surely consumers don’t care about first cross ewes being mulesed.”

Pushing ‘mulesing’ conversation under the rug is dangerous

The MLA leader told his dinner audience that consumers did not differentiate between sheep.

“Most of them just think a sheep is a sheep.

“Consumers also will change our industry and we have to either embrace it or work out ways to tell the story so that we can continue,” he said.

“If we can’t tell the story and continue with our practices on farm, someone else will tell us how to run the farm, because consumers want audited data around what you are doing on farm.

“They eat the product, they pay for the product and they have an expectation that they should understand what you do on farm – that’s fact, it’s not my opinion.”

Mr Norton said as a marketing organisation MLA spent millions of dollars trying to find out what consumers think.

“Not having the conversation and pushing it under the rug I think is quite dangerous.”

Society should get a grip – Roberts

In response to Mr Norton’s comments, Queensland wool grower Will Roberts said he wondered what photos of childbirth or caesarean sections would do to sex in the world.

“For our point of view it (mulesing) is one of the best things we can do from an animal welfare perspective,” Mr Roberts said.

“I think that society has just got to get a grip on themselves, and get an understanding of what happens to our animals if we don’t do it.”

Mr Norton said: “we agree and that was the exact point I made – is that we just need to tell our story … and why are we ashamed of what we do? That’s entirely my point.”

Mr Roberts said what sheep producers had “gathered” from Mr Norton’s comments that they should be ashamed of mulesing sheep, but Mr Norton said he had said that the industry was “exposed” on the issue of mulesing.

“Open and transparent as I can be I am just asking for industry to let me market your product in an open and transparent manner and let’s do it.

“I did choose my words very carefully in what I said; I said that it is a good animal welfare outcome, a surgical procedure done by professionals with pain relief, with the peer-reviewed R&D that there is no pain to the animal that it is done (to) – that is all I have said,” Mr Norton said.

“The comments were taken out of context and so be it, but I am blessed with the opportunity for the right of reply tonight, so thank you.”


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.


  1. Hugh Winwood-Smith, September 6, 2018

    Edward Wymer said “I believe only one in a hundred people in Australia would know what mulesing is – one in a thousand overseas, let’s leave it that way”.
    So basically what he is saying, is let’s keep this a secret, so that people don’t know what the animals endure. Thank you for demonstrating my point; the attitude of the animal agriculture industry in a nutshell.

  2. Rob Sachell, August 9, 2017

    Norton is as weak as water. MLA should be spending our money tackling the misinformation and fake news on the issue. Yes, the industry is exposed, so tackle it by informing the consumer. Anyway, price is king, not traceability. Put two packages of meat on a supermarket shelf, an expensive one from Bob’s farm at Tyrendarra with all the traceability and a cheap package from somewhere…. which sells more? We must stay efficient, we must keep our quality and clean green image up, but we also have to stay cheap.

  3. Edward Wymer, July 22, 2017

    Hugh, I love eating lamb, I guess you don’t. I believe only one in a hundred people in Australia would know what mulesing is – one in a thousand overseas, let’s leave it that way.

  4. Hugh Winwood-Smith, July 22, 2017

    The public needs to “get a grip”? Very helpful attitude.

    Perhaps it’s you who needs to get a grip, and recognise the blind spot you have towards these animals, because you see them as nothing more than units of profit, whose lives have no inherent ethical value?

    You’ve created the situation that requires mulesing, so it’s a bit rich to claim it’s in the animal’s interests. It’s not in the animal’s interests to be farmed in the first place, it’s in yours. Nothing about the situation is in the animal’s interests. If you create a situation that requires you to harm an animal for “it’s own good” then claiming it’s good welfare is ridiculous.

  5. Michael Craig, July 17, 2017

    Mandating pain relief for mulesing is a no-brainer. As a producer who ceased mulesing 10 years ago the long term path is genetic selection. However, I completely understand why, from an animal welfare perspective, some producers still need to mules; because of their specific sheep type combined with their environment or extensive production systems. Make pain relief mandatory and then focus on a long term genetic path through breech scoring and corrective mating. Producers may realise they don’t have to mules all of them, just the score 4 and 5s. But once you mules them you can’t score them.
    Animal welfare issues don’t have to be incendiary; we have free range natural, ethical production systems. If we see the bigger picture we can turn a threat into an opportunity. Industry can get there, but Rome wasn’t built in a day.

Get Sheep Central's news headlines emailed to you -