Agribusiness

Farm tractor scam features in ACCC Scamwatch report

Neil Lyon, Grain Central, June 7, 2021

FARMERS were among the thousands of Australians fleeced of millions of dollars by sophisticated scams last year, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has reported.

In particular, the ACCC’s Scamwatch website received 334 complaints about a new scam type involving tractors and heavy machinery, with $1.1 million in reported losses.

These scams arose during the COVID-19 pandemic and involved fake online listings for farm equipment, such as tractors, bulldozers, backhoes, diggers and other agricultural machinery, at prices well below the average market rate.

Heavy machinery scams predominantly targeted farmers who were looking for a good deal on equipment.

In many of the instances, the scammers used COVID-19 as an excuse to convince small business owners to pay up-front for these items without physically seeing them.

In one case study highlighted in the report, scammers had a very impressive website offering cheap tractors that proved too good to be true.

“The website is even written eloquently but when a farmer contacts them, the replies (supposedly from the sales manager) are in terrible English.

“They are claiming due to COVID-19 you cannot visit them or inspect the tractors, but they will deliver for free in 14 days with a free return policy,” the ACCC said.

“It all starts to become very fishy and when you image search their profile photos (taken from the About Us page) you realise it is all a scam.”

Scammers get active around current events and crises

The ACCC study – ‘Targeting scams: report of the ACCC on scam activity 2020’ – was released today and said scam losses and reports of scams in Australia last year climbed during the bushfires and COVID-19 pandemic.

It found Australians lost over $850 million to scams and made 444,164 scam reports in total to Scamwatch, ReportCyber,1 other government agencies, banks and payment platforms in 2020.

Based on this combined data, the scams causing the most financial harm to Australians in 2020 were:

 $328 million lost to investment scams

 $131 million lost to romance scams

 $128 million lost to business email compromise (payment redirection scams).

The report said scammers were quick to take advantage of crises. Scammers set up fake charity scams in response to the bushfires and took advantage of pandemic related incentive schemes available in Australia.

Levels of phishing activity increased to unprecedented levels as scammers sought personal information from Australian consumers and businesses to fraudulently access government programs.

The top three categories of reports to Scamwatch were phishing, threats to life, arrest or other (threat-based scams) and identity theft.

Reports in these categories often involved the impersonation of government agencies to obtain personal information or demand money.

Phishing activity thrived during the pandemic. Over 44,000 reports were received, representing a 75 percent increase.

Reports of threat-based scams, which typically involve scammers threatening victims with arrest, deportation, legal action or excessive ‘fees’ unless money they claim is owed is paid, increased by 140pc to just over 32,000 reports. There was a corresponding 178pc increase in losses to these scams of $11.8 million.

Similarly, identity theft reports increased by 84pc to over 20,000 reports. A number of government taskforces and law enforcement noted the increase in crimes aimed at stealing personal information and connected this to conduct aimed at fraudulently accessing COVID-19 related initiatives such as early access to superannuation.

In 2020, 25pc of all scam reports involved the loss of personal information, up from 16pc in 2019. Loss of personal information was even higher among Indigenous consumers, where 36pc of all scam reports involved the loss of personal information.

The increasing value of personal information at a time when face to face transactions were not possible was a significant driver of scam activity in 2020.

ACCC expects scammers to exploit COVID-19 pandemic

ACCC deputy chair Delia Rickard said it was hard to predict the new ways scams would evolve over the coming years.

“However, there are some prevailing trends that will likely become more prominent in the near future,” she said.

“It is very common for scammers to utilise current events and crises to make their scam appear more legitimate.

“We saw this in 2020 where scammers first used the bushfire emergency and then the COVID-19 pandemic as a basis for new scams, including fake charity, puppy scams, phishing and superannuation scams,” Ms Rickard said.

“We expect that the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to be exploited by scammers, specifically as vaccines are distributed throughout 2021.”

For example, scams relating to vaccinations may be:

 buying and selling scams claiming to offer the vaccine in exchange for money

 phishing scams that appear to be for vaccine registration or application

 health based scams that involve selling products that scammers claim to be vaccines.

Ms Rickard said the growing trend of scammers claiming to be from the government was likely to continue.

“New forms of government impersonation scams may also occur, such as emails or text messages containing malware links that may hold threats if an attachment or link is not actioned, similar to the threat-based scam phone calls that occurred in 2020.”

Click here to read the full report: ‘Targeting scams: report of the ACCC on scam activity 2020’.  People who have been scammed or who believe they have spotted a scam are encouraged to report it to Scamwatch on https://www.scamwatch.gov.au/report-a-scam

Source: ACCC

HAVE YOUR SAY

Your email address will not be published.

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.

Comments

  1. Ray lane, October 10, 2021

    I had a close encounter with a fraudulent machinery site this week while trying to but a tractor. Machinery looked perfect and price was right. The company seemed very professional, with lots of very impressive machinery on offer at very competitive prices.
    The company claimed to be based in south-west UK, but their stock was based in Bremen in northern Germany. I asked how business was to be conducted after choosing a specific machine. They said once I placed an order via email they would issue a sales invoice and then they said I should go to my bank and transfer the agreed price to a bank in Berlin. Once they had confirmation of the transaction they would immediately start the delivery process.
    I asked if it was possible to do a walk around video inspection and was told no as all the stock was located in their German site and due to Covid-19 only a skeleton staff were available, but they assured me of the excellent quality of the product and that it carried a 12-month international warrantee. It had undergone a in-depth inspection and full service.
    They issued the invoice and instructed that I had to complete the payment within a 24-hour period from the invoice time. I felt a little bit exposed by their refusal to do a walk around video, the dubious reason why all their stock was kept in Germany and why a UK-based company would want to be paid in a German bank and that bank was 495km away from their German office. So early next morning I composed an email which read: Dear Sirs, After consulting my accountant and explaining the situation he suggested that a C.O.D arrangement or a Paypal arrangement would seem more prudent and secure. Their response was as follows: Dear Raymond, we suggest you buy from your accountant so and we are cancelling the transaction.
    I have looked at Google maps and Google street at the addresses supplied and can see not even one tractor at either. I have on file all their details and correspondence and can supply these to the relevant authorities. On further surfing of the Internet I discovered the same tractor same registration number for sale in another machinery dealer for about the same price. This dealer appears to be Kent-based. I hope this is of help to other perspective buyers.
    Caveat emptor, buyer beware.
    Ray Lane.

Get Sheep Central's news headlines emailed to you -
FREE!