Recruitment

Recruitment: Giving more effective employee feedback

Sheep Central, March 6, 2020

Latest listings on Jobs Central recruitment page:

  • Weighbridge / Administration Officer, Grassdale – Mort&Co
  • Farm Hand / Machinery Operator – Stanbroke
  • Feed Mill Leading Hand – Stanbroke
  • Livestock Leading Hand – Stanbroke
  • Working Manager, Bell Hill – via Spinifex Recruiting
  • Farm Operations Manager, Goodar – Cunningham Cattle Co
  • Distribution & Coordination Manager, Export – via Spinifex
  • Strategic Development & Partnerships, Extension & Adoption – 3 positions – via Agricultural Appointments
  • Pen Rider – Rangers Valley
  • Induction / Cattle Processing – Rangers Valley
  • Operator, Feedlot – Rangers Valley
  • Policy Director, Agricultural Industries NSW – via Agri. Appointments
  • Sales Consultant – via Agricultural Appointments
  • Overseer / Station Hand, VIC – Eddington Pastoral

Click here to access these and other exciting meat and livestock supply chain jobs currently listed on Jobs Central.

 

WE’VE all been there ourselves.  We have received feedback and certainly know the way it’s delivered impacts the way it’s received.

We call it feedback, but in some instances, it may be criticism. Criticism is OK, but as long as it is constructive.

For managers of agribusinesses anywhere along the meat and livestock supply chain, there are important aspects to consider when delivering feedback to employees.

Importantly, don’t wait for a performance review to give feedback. Issues can escalate and your employee needs an opportunity to make improvements now:

Ensure feedback is not given publicly. Scheduling a face-to-face meeting will limit embarrassment for your staff member and gives them a better chance to respond.

Don’t give feedback when you are angry. Take some time to cool off first.

Feedback should be specific. Just saying a staffmember’s work is not up to scratch will not communicate what the issue may be. You may be able to link back to Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or just pinpoint the issue, if it is just task orientated.

Don’t let it be personal.  Saying “I hate the way you……..” should be replaced with “I’m concerned with the way you’re vaccinating the weaners. Is there an issue? Would you like some further training?”

Ensure you give positive feedback (where due, and don’t always let every face-to-face meeting be to deliver negative feedback).

Be fair, and don’t hammer home the same message over and over.  Make sure you aren’t criticising the way something is done solely because it’s not the way you would do it.

Give your employee a chance to respond to your feedback.  There may be a valid reason for a change in their performance or approach to a task.

Finish on a positive note.  Communicate that you appreciate their contribution in the workplace.

Monitor performance and follow-up down the track to see if there is improvement or not.

Believe it or not, people who receive feedback apply it only about 30pc of the time, according to Columbia University neuroscientist Kevin Ochsner.

To get the desired outcomes, deliver feedback effectively, and you will have a better chance of it being applied.

 

Source: AgCareers.com Australia  

 

 

 

 

HAVE YOUR SAY

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your comment will not appear until it has been moderated.
Contributions that contravene our Comments Policy will not be published.

Comments

  1. Jack Cleary, March 9, 2020

    The reasons for giving ‘true’ feedback…rather than machination or ‘ventilating’ or even driving a person to resign should be to compound change or maintain a level. Criticism from management is best cool and at the level of the receiver, not elitist or bullying or overbearing and implicitly threatening. In other words, well-thought through emotive feedback from workers should not be discarded as the emotions may result from the situation and be a valuable tool.

    “I’m concerned with the way you’re vaccinating the weaners. Is there an issue? Would you like some further training?” is not a good approach..it is immediately critical.

    Good attack on it is:

    “Would you take me through how you vaccinate the (XYZ) I have to diarise our consistency and discuss our quality assurance with each person individually.”

    “I need you to show me your vaccination method so I can discuss it with you and the others individually to make sure we are on the same page as an organisation.”

    “Could we go through your vaccination method?…I have to ensure we will all pass examination on ‘modern practices’ and you can help by discussing them with me and maybe experimenting as we go.”

Get Sheep Central's news headlines emailed to you -
FREE!